Typos

diff --git a/lib/indirect.pm b/lib/indirect.pm
index 6cdf32af8d871ccb9999d67d7ddc5836c4acb3c3..01eed4f1801d3649b01cb4cc21dff671c0b0ea08 100644 (file)
--- a/lib/indirect.pm
+++ b/lib/indirect.pm
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ BEGIN {
 
 When enabled (or disabled as some may prefer to say, since you actually turn it on by calling C<no indirect>), this pragma warns about indirect object syntax constructs that may have slipped into your code.
 
 
 When enabled (or disabled as some may prefer to say, since you actually turn it on by calling C<no indirect>), this pragma warns about indirect object syntax constructs that may have slipped into your code.
 

-This syntax is now considered harmful, since its parsing has many quirks and its use is error prone (when C<swoosh> isn't defined, C<swoosh $x> actually compiles to C<< $x->swoosh >>).
+This syntax is now considered harmful, since its parsing has many quirks and its use is error prone (when C<swoosh> is not defined, C<swoosh $x> actually compiles to C<< $x->swoosh >>).

 In L<http://www.shadowcat.co.uk/blog/matt-s-trout/indirect-but-still-fatal>, Matt S. Trout gives an example of an indirect construct that can cause a particularly bewildering error.
 
 It currently does not warn for core functions (C<print>, C<say>, C<exec> or C<system>).
 In L<http://www.shadowcat.co.uk/blog/matt-s-trout/indirect-but-still-fatal>, Matt S. Trout gives an example of an indirect construct that can cause a particularly bewildering error.
 
 It currently does not warn for core functions (C<print>, C<say>, C<exec> or C<system>).


@@ -175,11 +175,11 @@ In this case, the pragma will always be considered to be thread-safe, and as suc
 This is useful for disabling C<indirect> in production environments.
 
 Note that clearing this variable after C<indirect> was loaded has no effect.
 This is useful for disabling C<indirect> in production environments.
 
 Note that clearing this variable after C<indirect> was loaded has no effect.

-If you want to reenable the pragma later, you also need to reload it by deleting the C<'indirect.pm'> entry from C<%INC>.
+If you want to re-enable the pragma later, you also need to reload it by deleting the C<'indirect.pm'> entry from C<%INC>.

 
 =head1 CAVEATS
 
 
 =head1 CAVEATS
 

-The implementation was tweaked to work around several limitations of vanilla C<perl> pragmas : it's thread safe, and doesn't suffer from a C<perl 5.8.x-5.10.0> bug that causes all pragmas to propagate into C<require>d scopes.
+The implementation was tweaked to work around several limitations of vanilla C<perl> pragmas : it's thread safe, and does not suffer from a C<perl 5.8.x-5.10.0> bug that causes all pragmas to propagate into C<require>d scopes.

 
 C<meth $obj> (no semicolon) at the end of a file won't be seen as an indirect object syntax, although it will as soon as there is another token before the end (as in C<meth $obj;> or C<meth $obj 1>).
 
 
 C<meth $obj> (no semicolon) at the end of a file won't be seen as an indirect object syntax, although it will as soon as there is another token before the end (as in C<meth $obj;> or C<meth $obj 1>).