From: Vincent Pit <vince@profvince.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 17:37:49 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: Spelling
X-Git-Tag: v0.05~3
X-Git-Url: http://git.vpit.fr/?p=perl%2Fmodules%2FPerl-Critic-Policy-Dynamic-NoIndirect.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=58a9ffe8438fadf107b8414ca71b1e691860027c;hp=9a658054acd1d628ba4f98c49127fcdf8fd1512b

Spelling
---

diff --git a/lib/Perl/Critic/Policy/Dynamic/NoIndirect.pm b/lib/Perl/Critic/Policy/Dynamic/NoIndirect.pm
index b14ecf5..74d3430 100644
--- a/lib/Perl/Critic/Policy/Dynamic/NoIndirect.pm
+++ b/lib/Perl/Critic/Policy/Dynamic/NoIndirect.pm
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ sub violates_dynamic {
 
 =head1 CAVEATS
 
-The uses of the L<indirect> pragma inside the auditted code take precedence over this policy.
+The uses of the L<indirect> pragma inside the audited code take precedence over this policy.
 Hence no violations will be reported for indirect method calls that are located inside the lexical scope of C<use indirect> or C<< no indirect hook => ... >>.
 Occurrences of C<no indirect> won't be a problem.