+ "unwind"
+ unwind @values;
+ unwind @values, $context;
+
+ Returns @values *from* the context pointed by $context, i.e. from the
+ subroutine, eval or format at or just above $context, and immediately
+ restart the program flow at this point - thus effectively returning to
+ an upper scope.
+
+ The upper context isn't coerced onto @values, which is hence always
+ evaluated in list context. This means that
+
+ my $num = sub {
+ my @a = ('a' .. 'z');
+ unwind @a => HERE;
+ # not reached
+ }->();
+
+ will set $num to 'z'. You can use "want_at" to handle these cases.
+
+ "want_at"
+ my $want = want_at;
+ my $want = want_at $context;
+
+ Like "wantarray", but for the subroutine/eval/format at or just above
+ $context.
+
+ The previous example can then be "corrected" :
+
+ my $num = sub {
+ my @a = ('a' .. 'z');
+ unwind +(want_at(HERE) ? @a : scalar @a) => HERE;
+ # not reached
+ }->();
+
+ will rightfully set $num to 26.
+
+ "uplevel $code, @args, $context"
+ my @ret = uplevel { ...; return @ret };
+ my @ret = uplevel { my @args = @_; ...; return @ret } @args;
+ my @ret = uplevel { ... } @args, $context;
+ my @ret = &uplevel($callback, @args, $context);
+
+ Executes the code reference $code with arguments @args as if it were
+ located at the subroutine stack frame pointed by $context, effectively
+ fooling "caller" and "die" into believing that the call actually
+ happened higher in the stack. The code is executed in the context of the
+ "uplevel" call, and what it returns is returned as-is by "uplevel".
+
+ sub target {
+ faker(@_);
+ }
+
+ sub faker {
+ uplevel {
+ map { 1 / $_ } @_;
+ } @_ => CALLER(1);
+ }
+
+ my @inverses = target(1, 2, 4); # @inverses contains (0, 0.5, 0.25)
+ my $count = target(1, 2, 4); # $count is 3
+
+ Sub::Uplevel also implements a pure-Perl version of "uplevel". Both are
+ identical, with the following caveats :
+
+ * The Sub::Uplevel implementation of "uplevel" may execute a code
+ reference in the context of any upper stack frame. The Scope::Upper
+ version can only uplevel to a subroutine stack frame, and will croak
+ if you try to target an "eval" or a format.
+
+ * Exceptions thrown from the code called by this version of "uplevel"
+ will not be caught by "eval" blocks between the target frame and the
+ uplevel call, while they will for Sub::Uplevel's version. This means
+ that :
+
+ eval {
+ sub {
+ local $@;
+ eval {
+ sub {
+ uplevel { die 'wut' } CALLER(2); # for Scope::Upper
+ # uplevel(3, sub { die 'wut' }) # for Sub::Uplevel
+ }->();
+ };
+ print "inner block: $@";
+ $@ and exit;
+ }->();
+ };
+ print "outer block: $@";
+
+ will print "inner block: wut..." with Sub::Uplevel and "outer block:
+ wut..." with Scope::Upper.
+
+ * Sub::Uplevel globally overrides the Perl keyword "caller", while
+ Scope::Upper does not.
+
+ A simple wrapper lets you mimic the interface of "uplevel" in
+ Sub::Uplevel :
+
+ use Scope::Upper;
+
+ sub uplevel {
+ my $frame = shift;
+ my $code = shift;
+ my $cxt = Scope::Upper::CALLER($frame);
+ &Scope::Upper::uplevel($code => @_ => $cxt);
+ }
+
+ Albeit the three exceptions listed above, it passes all the tests of
+ Sub::Uplevel.